|
|
| *Travel Tips>>>Malaysia Travel Tips |
Do you agree that provisions of innkeepers act 1952 are stiil relevant and suitable at present in malaysia? |
Travel Info Do you agree that provisions of innkeepers act 1952 are stiil relevant and suitable at present in malaysia? Travel Tips sorry, not familiar with the law. which clause(s) do you think is/are irrrelevant? storekeepers act ada ka? i wish karpal singh is here -edit- it's okay repairman, he' got difficulties understanding some legal terms. but at least you won't find some robbery stories Others That's invasion to one's privacy. Bo$$ i think we need karam singh wallia here as well.... Dave is drunk superman... No, the Act require some revamp. Disputable liabilities of innkeepers for the lost of guests' property need to be addressed. I was an 'Innkeeper' if you like (ran a pub/restaurant in Malaysia for five years) but I'm not so sure what Dave Star is asking, err I mean answering. What 'invasion to one's privacy' is implied here? Saya tidak faham/I dont understand, please tell me. The act was formed to regulate the standards and responsibilities of both innkeepers and guests. Such laws provide the foundation on which the practitioner can only further improve. If you are an innkeeper (or hotelier as it is called today), then you should set your standards to exceed what is required. The customer's satisfaction is paramount for repeat business. It is for you to exceed his/her expections. On the other hand, if you are a guest, and feel the provisions are inadequate (e.g compensation in event of loss), then highlight it to the relevant hotelier. I am sure a compromise can be reached as your interests are important to his/her future business and reputation. |
| Tags |
| General - Australia & New Zealand China Indonesia Japan Korea Malaysia Maldives Nepal Philippines Singapore Taiwan |
Travel Info Categories--Copyright/IP Policy--Contact Webmaster |